EchtVerdientby bytearium
Menu
DEFind your match
← Back to all options
Goods · Products instead of cashProduct testing

Konsumgöttinnen
honestly rated.

Product testing paid in goods rather than money: you usually keep the product, there is no cash, only bonus points for prize draws, and selection is by profile plus lottery.

At a glance

For you if you are a woman and like testing free products. There is no money in it.

Watch out for: You get goods instead of money, a lottery partly decides who is selected, and the platform is for women only.

Payout
Goods (test product)
Threshold
Not applicable: there is no cash payout.
Timing
Not applicable; test products are sent to you once you are selected.
ID check
unclear
Check terms at Konsumgöttinnen Direct link · no known compensation for EchtVerdient.
EchtVerdient rating

What public experiences say about Konsumgöttinnen.

Pleasant for free products, but not a side income in the sense of money.

OverallNot enough dataShown once four categories are rated (currently 1 of 5).

  1. Payouts

    Does the money arrive reliably and on time?

    Not enough data

    Not enough data and not applicable: there is no cash payout, only goods and prize draws.

  2. Time value

    What's left per hour once screen-outs, searching and waiting count?

    Not enough data

    Not enough data: an hourly value in euros cannot be documented for goods in kind.

  3. Task supply

    Is there regularly something to do in Germany?

    Not enough data

    Not enough data: campaigns with hundreds of slots run continuously, but the selection rate is not documented and partly decided by lottery.

  4. Getting started

    How high are the hurdles to get going?

    Moderate evidence

    Free sign-up and per-campaign applications without special gear, though the platform is for women only and expects reviews, a survey and word-of-mouth sharing.

  5. Fairness & support

    How fair are bans, rejections and support?

    Not enough data

    Not enough data: no aggregated reviews on how testers are treated; Testwatch only criticizes the advertising nature.

What people often praise

  • Free test products, usually yours to keep
  • Large community (provider claim)
  • No fee and no payment risk

What people often criticise

  • No money, only goods and prize draws
  • Lottery selection, no guaranteed participation
  • Women only; critics see the tests as advertising
Heads-up
  • Goods, not money: do not present as an income source.
  • Only one category can be rated, so there is no overall rating.
  • Aggregated reviews are missing.
Show all 4 sources with dates

How the rating is made: we read public reviews, experience reports and tests and summarise them in our own words. We can't verify whether individual reviews on those platforms come from genuine users; the platforms themselves are responsible for that. Commissions have no influence on the rating. Read the methodology

Facts with sources

What the provider and reports actually say.

Every item has a source and a date. Where sources contradict each other, we show the conflict instead of picking the nicer number.

Reward
Test products are free and usually yours to keep; plus bonus points that only lead to prize draws. No cash. ↗
Co-payment
For very high-value products there is a co-payment of at most 50 % of the RRP; you can return the product if you don't like it. ↗
Selection
Selection by profile and application survey; among equally suited applications, a lottery also decides. ↗
Resale
According to the provider, reselling a test product is strictly forbidden. ↗
Target group
The provider describes itself as a recommendation platform for women only. ↗
Community
More than 330,000 members according to the provider; current campaigns with 500 to 1,500 testers. ↗
Advertising nature
Testwatch (2020) calls the tests disguised product advertising. ↗
Data & permissions

What you need to bring.

Listed one by one, so you know upfront whether ID, camera or microphone are involved.

  • Identity check: not documented as a general requirement
  • Screen recording: not typical
  • Voice recording: not typical
  • Camera recording: not typical
  • App installation: not generally documented
  • Purchase required: no
  • Devices: Smartphone · Computer
Still open

What we don't know for sure (yet).

  • Are there independent reviews with 100 or more entries (Trustpilot, app stores)? Not found in the lookups.
  • How often are members actually selected? The figures come from individual reports and forums, some from 2014.
  • Which obligations (reports, social posts) are laid down in the terms of participation?
Last step outside EchtVerdient

Check the terms yourself before signing up.

Sign-up, checks and payouts happen at Konsumgöttinnen, not through EchtVerdient.

Check terms at Konsumgöttinnen Direct link · no known compensation for EchtVerdient.